Showing posts with label Body Scans TSA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Body Scans TSA. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Biochemist, Pilots, Passengers Backlash Against Naked Body Scanners

Biochemist, Pilots, Passengers Backlash Against Naked Body Scanners
Written by Teresa Knudsen. First published on Suite 101 November 13, 2010.
Republished January 11, 2012 on Sweet Suite Writings

Biochemist, Pilots, Passengers Backlash against Naked Body Scans

The latest news about the U.S government deployment of compulsory naked body scanners for air travelers comes from a biochemist's warning that the body scanners have not been proved to be safe and a national protest against the scanners planned for the day before Thanksgiving, 2010.

Biochemist Warns on November 11, 2010 of Unsafe Scanning Machines

As noted in the article "Biochemist Says 'Naked' X-Ray Scanner May Be Unsafe" by Declan McCullagh on November 11, 2010, a biochemist from the University of California, San Francisco, Professor John Sedat called Obama's claim that full-body scanners are safe, an "error."

Sedat said that from the White House report, "...it appears that real independent safety data do not exist." Sedat notes the naked body scanner threat to travelers, particularly children being exposed to untested types of radiation emitted by the scanners.

"National Opt Out Day." November 24, 2010.

The National Opt Out Day website encourages air passengers to opt out of the government's body scan machines, which send the passenger's naked image to be viewed by a government employee. As noted on the website:

"It's the day ordinary citizens stand up for their rights, stand up for liberty, and protest the federal government's desire to virtually strip us naked or submit to an "enhanced pat down" that touches people's breasts and genitals in an aggressive manner."

Background of Body Scanners Deployment in Airports

After the failed bombing attempt on Christmas, former head of the Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, outlined his solution to possible similar bombing. Chertoff advised that the U. S. government purchase hundred of body scan machines from a company he now represents as CEO of the Chertoff Group.

The U.S. government used funds marked to help Americans receive an economic stimulus, and instead placed machines and staff that require air passengers to surrender their 4th Amendment rights and endure a virtual strip search from machines that deliver an unknown radiation experiment.

Then, the passengers can be groped on breasts and genital areas by Transportation Security Administration staff. The TSA is now groping men, women, tweens, children, toddlers and babies, as well as elderly people.

The bad experiences of airline passengers are piling up about the body scans and the TSA actions, which amount to unreasonable search and seizure, as well as sexual molestation by government officials, as reported by CNN's Phil Gast in the November 13, 2010 article, "Growing Backlash against TSA Body Scanners, Pat-Downs."

Complaints about Government Body Scans and Groping by Government Staff

Michelle Nemphos describes her daughter's bad experience of being singled out and forced to go through a full body scanner. The 12-year-old felt tramatized when she realized what was happening with the machine and airport staff seeing her naked. In the article "Mother Upset about Daughter's Full Body Securty Scan Experience,"

Michelle Nemphos sums up the issue of allowing government workers to view naked passengers, especially children.

"It's an image of a nude child that they're seeing. This is child pornography whether people want to believe this or not. People think that this is a blurry image. It is not a blurry image. It is an image of a naked person."

In the article "Airport Body-Scanners Reveal All, But What about When It's Your Kid?" Lenonora LaPeter Anton, staff writer at the St. Petersburg Times, talked with TSA spokeswoman Sari Koshetz, who said anyone can be selected from the line and given a body scan. This includes children who can hold their arms over their heads for five or more seconds. There was no TSA statement about how TSA would determine which children could hold their arms up and which children couldn't.

Airline Pilots Against Body Scans, "Pat-Downs"

As reported by CNN, " ExpressJet Pilot Rejects Body Scan and "Pat-Down," Pilot Michael Roberts, as he was preparing to travel by plane to work, rejected both the U.S. government naked body scan and the enhanced "pat-down" from government Transportation Security Administration (TSA) staff.

Roberts said both the scan and "pat-down" by government workers violates his rights.

"Pat down is misleading...They concentrate on the area between...the upper thighs and torso, and they're not just patting people's arms and leg, they're grabbing and groping and prodding pretty agressively."

The Allied Pilots Association President Captain Dave Bates advises the pilots to refuse the U.S. government naked body scanners, in a letter sent to The Atlantic, published November 4, 2010, in the article "American Airlines Pilots in Revolt Against the TSA." by Jeffrey Goldberg.

Government Staff at TSA Seem to Select Women and Children for Scanning and Groping

In San Jose, at the airport, Alex Jones stated that he saw TSA workers only select women and small children to go through the government naked body scanners.

Alex describes the children "...in strollers being put through naked body scanners, being bathed in radiation. It violates your Fourth Amendment."

The TSA is planning to force all passengers through the naked body scanner and the "enhanced pat-down," which includes a government agent using the front of his or her hands and fingers for groping, grabbing and squeezing the private parts of airline passengers. This "enhanced pat-down" is now being referred to as the "x-rated pat-down." The process is designed for the government agent's hand to feel everything on every man, woman and child.

A woman on the Alex Jones show describes her experience in security at Denver Airport. She and her two children walked through the metal detector. The TSA staff then wanted her to go through the naked scanner. The woman did not want her children or herself to be subjected to the radiaition and naked images of the body scanner, so she and her children were subjected to a "pat-down."

The woman was groped by a male TSA agent. "They feel your private area. They grab your breast..."
The male TSA agent then wanted to grope her two daughters, aged 8 years old and 20 months old. The mother would not allow the male to touch her two children, and requested a female officer. "I want a woman to pat down my children...They did the same thing to the kids they did to me."

"You were sexually assaulted." Alex Jones to the mother, "This is slave training...This is outrageous."

If a passenger declines to go through the naked body scanner, the U.S government TSA workers willl begin to yell "Opt Out! Opt Out!" Then, expect a lot of U.S government TSA staff to appear.
The general experience for the "enhanced pat-down" is that the U.S. government TSA staff will then place the front of their hands all over the passenger, including breast and genital area, with grabbing, pulling and twisting motions, on passengers of all ages.

References
"Airport Body-Scanners Reveal All, But What about When It's Your Kid?"
As reported by Lenonora LaPeter Anton, staff writer at the St. Petersburg Times, "
"American Airlines Pilots in Revolt Against the TSA." By Jeffrey Goldberg. The Atlantic. November 4, 2010.
"Backlash Grows Over TSA's 'Naked Strip Searches.'" By Declan McCullagh. November 11, 2010.
"Body Scanner, the Constitution, Ethics, and X-Ray." Suite 101.
"ExpressJet Pilot Rejects Body Scan and "Pat-Down." CNN. Oct. 20, 2010
" Growing Backlash against TSA Body Scanners, Pat-Downs." By Phil Gast. CNN. November 13, 2010 .
"Naked Body Scanners May Be Dangerous: Scientists." By Agence France-Presse. Friday, November 12, 2010
"National Opt Out Day." November 24, 2010.optoutday.com
"TSA Fondles Women and Children Refusing Airport Naked Body Scanners." Alex Jones. Infowars.com. Nov. 5, 2010.

Body Scanners, From Airports to Football Games

Body Scanners, From Airports to Football Games
Written by Teresa Knudsen. First published on Suite 101 January 11, 2010.
Republished January 11, 2012 on Sweet Suite Writings

Body Scanners, From Airports to Football Games


On Christmas Day, 2009, a passenger on Northwest Flight 253 was charged with trying to blow up an airliner, traveling the Netherlands to Detroit. According to reports, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab concealed an explosive, PETN, or pentaerythritol, also used by the "shoe bomber" Richard Reid, and tried to blow up the plane.

Reports indicate that in November 2009, the man's father tried to warn the Nigerian US embassy of his son's religious beliefs, but that the warning was ignored. In addition, although Abdulmutallab's name was in the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment, people on the list are not stopped from taking a plane to the United States.

The U.S. Transportation Safety Administration, with the Obama administration and Congress, is working to compel all airline travelers to undergo full-body scans, which might or might not reveal explosives such as PETN, but which would reveal a person's body unclothed in complete detail resulting in pornography, and which would give dangerous radiation to travelers.

Body Scanners

There are two general types of scanners, as explained by Jeremy Hsu in his April 1, 2009 article "Airport Body Scanners Reveal All."

"The TSA has tested two technologies, including "millimeter wave" (MMW) technology which bounces radio-frequency waves off people to construct a 3-D image within a few seconds. TSA also temporarily leased four "backscatter" units which use X-ray scanning, although the MMW method is currently faster."

Practical Issues

There is concern that not only will the body scanners cause further delays at airports, but also that the body scanners are not an effective counter-terrorism tool, according to Mark Guarino's recent article in the Christian Science Monitor.

In the article, the senior editor of Aviation Week, Andrew Compart, explained that the 45 second scan per passenger will create hours of delays for air travelers. In additon, Compart believes that better intelligence-gathering is a more effective tool for anti-terrorism than body scanning.

Some in Congress agree. As reported by John Hayes in the Chicago Tribune, Representative Jason Chhaffetz, R-Utah, stated on January 8, 2010:

“We don’t need to look at naked 8-year-olds and grandmothers to secure airplanes. Are we really going to subject 2 million people per day to that? I think it’s a false argument to say we have to give up all of our personal privacy in order to have security.”

The discussion will continue. Besides airports, government and business have plans to expand the use of body scanners to public gatherings, such as sports events, and to general body scanning on the street, by mobile vehicles, or even scanners on lamp posts. The Dutch police are working on a mobile scanner, for mass scans of crowds. British security are working on street scanning.
For further discussion, see "Britain Requires Air Passengers to be Scanned."

References

  • American Civil Liberties Union. "Body Scanners." March 15, 2002.
  • The Bill of Rights. National Archives Records Administration.
  • Benen, Steve. "Michael Chertoff's Pushing 'Full-Body Scanner for Airports but He Has a Conflict of Interest." Washington Monthly. January 2, 2010.
  • Chertoff, Michael. "Former Homeland Security Chief Argues for Whole-Body Imaging." The Washington Post, January 1, 2010.
  • Foehammer. "Body Scanners. Do Not Submit." January 6, 2010.
  • Guarino, Mark. "Airport Security: Two Alternatives to Full-body Scanners." The Christian Science Monitor, December 31, 2009.
  • Hayes, John C. "Privacy Activists Score Victories against More Detailed Body Scanners at Airports." Chicago Tribune. Sunday, January 10th, 2010.
  • Hsu, Jeremy. "Airport Body Scanners Reveal All." LiveScience, April 1, 2009.
  • Savage, David. "Privacy Activists Score Victories Against More Detailed Body Scanners at Airports." Chicago Tribune, January 10, 2010.
  • Warren, Scott. "Full-body Airport Scanners Face Further Delays..." January 5, 2010.
  • Watson, Paul Joseph. "Now Mobile Devices Will Scan on the Street." Friday, January 8, 2010.

 

Feds Lied to US. Feds Keep Naked Images of US Body Scans

Feds Lied to US. Feds Keep Naked Images of US Body Scans
Written by Teresa Knudsen. First published on Suite 101 August 04, 2010.
Republished January 11, 2012 on Sweet Suite Writings

Feds Lied to US. Feds Keep Naked Images of US Body Scans


The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) filed a lawsuit to stop the U.S. government from taking naked body scans. EPIC's position is that the body scans are unconstitutional, violate privacy, are unsafe due to the levels of radiation, and unreliable in preventing a terrorist attack.

As reported by Declan McCullagh in the Privacy Inc. section of CNET, the U.S. Marshals Service replied that it has over 30,000 naked images of people who were forced into a naked body scanner at an Orlando, Florida, courthouse.

The U.S. Marshals admission contradicts the government agency, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). The TSA repeatedly gave statements that the body scanner machines were private. It turns out that the body scanner machines can and do store naked images, and the U.S. government keeps the naked images of both U.S. citizens and citizens of other countries without probable cause, violating the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights and the U. S. Constitution.

TSA May 9, 2010 Blog Gave False Information

Many U.S. citizens were unaware of the May 9, 2008 TSA blog announcement titled "You Asked for It...You Got It." The TSA announces that the "much requested, much anticipated, full body images...both front and back, male and female just like so many of you asked for."

In the May 9, 2008 TSA blog, the TSA stated, "TSA will not keep, store or transmit images."The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) filed a lawsuit in U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia, as well as a Freedom of Information Act (FIOA) request regarding "All unfiltered or unobscured images captured using Whole Body Imaging Technology."

U.S. Marshals Service States that it Keeps Naked Body Scans

In an August 2, 2010 letter, the U.S. Marshal Service admitted that it has kept over 30,000 images of U.S. citizens and citizens of other countries who went to the Orlando, Florida, federal courthouse.
The Marshals Service associate general counsel William Bordley admitted in a letter, "approximately 35,314 images...have been stored on the Brijot Gen2 machines."

The U. S. Marshals Service sent EPIC more than 100 naked body scan images of people entering the courthouse.

According to EPIC, the letter "proves that body scanning devices store and record images of individuals stripped naked." EPIC has asked the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for all of the stored images, but the DHS has refused.

In a January 1, 2010, editorial published by the Washington Post, the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, pushes the naked body scanners. He calls people who do not want to be photographed naked "privacy idealogues."

After working for the government agency from 2005 to 2009, Chertoff now is co-founder of The Chertoff Group, and represents at least one manufacturer of naked body scanners.

Sources
Bordley, William. Letter to John Verdi, Electronic Privacy Information Center. Aug. 2, 2010.
Chertoff, Michael. "Former Homeland Security Chief Argues for Whole-Body Imaging." Washington Post. January 1, 2010.
EPIC. "Whole Body Imaging Technology and Body Scanners. (Backscatter X-Ray and Millimeter Wave Screenings."
McCullagh, Declan. "Feds Admit Storing Checkpoint Body Scan Images." Privacy Inc. Aug. 4, 2010
Transportation Security Administration. "You Asked For It...You Got It." May 9, 2008.
Walters, Chris. "Courthouse in Florida has 35,000 Body Scans of Citizens." The Consumerist. Aug. 4, 2010.